Award Mouse thought multimedia interface book medal screen monitor

Inspectors General Investigations and Audits

Companies that are unfamiliar with Inspector General investigations and audits can find out the hard way that Inspectors General are among the most powerful officials in the US government. Housed inside nearly every federal agency as an internal watchdog, Inspectors General work to weed out waste, fraud, abuse, and mismanagement in the programs and operations of the agencies they oversee.

Companies that receive money from an agency pursuant to a contract, grant, or cooperative agreement thereby subject themselves to the authority of that agency’s Inspector General. To ensure that recipients are entitled to receive agency money and that the money disbursed is spent in accordance with applicable laws, regulations, and terms, Inspectors General have teams of auditors and investigators. When an audit or investigation results in a factual finding that a crime (typically, some kind of fraud) has (or may have) been committed, Inspectors General are statutorily required to refer the matter to the Department of Justice (DOJ) for a determination of whether criminal prosecution or civil litigation is warranted.

Inspector General inquiries can attract the attention of Congress and the press. In cases where the allegations are especially serious and/or the amount of money at issue is large, it is not uncommon for there to be congressional hearings, media stories, and DOJ involvement all at once – the proverbial “perfect storm” that, depending on the particulars, can significantly tarnish a company’s reputation and even lower its market value.

Inspectors General can also refer their findings to agency components that have the power to suspend or debar contractors and grantees. If a company derives a significant share of its revenue from government business, suspension or debarment can be its death knell.

Given the potential stakes, Inspector General inquiries, however innocuous they may seem at first, are not to be taken lightly. When an Inspector General’s office comes knocking, it pays to have counsel with the expertise, experience, and relationships needed to maximize the chances of the most favorable possible outcome.

Our Government Investigations & White Collar Practice Group, which includes a former Inspector General and several former federal prosecutors, has decades of experience successfully representing clients being investigated or audited by Inspectors General. Examples of that experience can be found in our Experience tab , and our lawyers have authored various publications on this topic, which can be found on our website and our Global Investigations & Compliance Review blog.

  • Represented a government contractor accused by the Navy’s Inspector General and the DOJ of failing to disclose a conflict of interest that facilitated the company’s obtaining government contracts. Ultimately, no action was taken against the client.
  • Representing a government contractor with respect to a voluntary self-disclosure to the DOJ, the Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS), and the Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Asset Controls (OFAC), as well as a mandatory disclosure to the contracting agency’s Inspector General, of export control violations. “No Action” letters have been received from BIS and OFAC (awaiting resolution with the other agencies).
  • Represented a company in an inquiry by the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction concerning processes and procedures to prevent the diversion of US government funds to the Taliban. The inquiry was closed with no action taken against the company.
  • Represented a closely held government contractor whose owners were accused by the Department of Defense’s Inspector General, the DOJ, certain members of Congress, and the news media of being “delinquent” on their federal income taxes and, thus, falsely certifying that they were eligible to receive federal contracts. Ultimately, there was no finding of wrongdoing.
  • Represented a nonprofit organization funded in part by DOJ grants in an investigation by the department and its Inspector General as to whether the organization misused grant funds. Negotiated a favorable settlement.
  • Represented a major insurance company with respect to an audit by the Department of Homeland Security’s Inspector General of various insurance companies’ participation in the “Write Your Own” program.
  • Represented a supplier of critical aerospace components to the Department of Defense in an investigation by the Inspector General and a congressional committee of the company’s pricing practices.
  • Represented a NASA grantee in an investigation by NASA’s Inspector General, the National Science Foundation’s (NSF) Inspector General, the NASA’s Suspension and Debarment Office, and a US Attorney’s Office of alleged misallocation of time. Ultimately, the matter was settled, with no finding of wrongdoing.
  • Represented one of the owners of a small, disabled veteran-owned business that was investigated by the Small Business Administration’s Inspector General and DOJ for allegedly falsely claiming to be such a business. Ultimately, no action was taken against the company.
  • Represented, as a potential third-party witness, a consultant to school districts with regard to the federal “E-Rate” program that subsidizes the cost of certain technology purchases for districts with significant numbers of economically disadvantaged children in an investigation by the Federal Communications Commission’s Inspector General as to whether those districts were obtaining subsidies to which they were not entitled. Ultimately, the consultant was not required to testify.
  • Represented an NSF grant recipient being investigated by that agency’s Inspector General and a congressional committee for allegedly misusing grant funds. Ultimately, there was no finding of wrongdoing.

  • Recognized in the GIR 100 by Global Investigations Review
  • Recognized for Corporate Compliance & Investigations in the UAE by Chambers Global.
  • Recognized for Crime, Fraud and Licensing - Fraud: Civil in London by Legal 500 UK.
  • Recognized for Risk Advisory: Regulatory Investigations and Corporate Crime (advice to corporates) in London by Legal 500 UK.
  • Recognized for Crime, Fraud and Licensing – Fraud: White-collar Crime (advice to individuals) in London by Legal 500 UK.
  • Recognized for Crime, Fraud and Licensing: Private Prosecutions in London by Legal 500 UK.
  • Recognized for Dispute Resolution: Compliance and Investigations in the UAE by Legal 500 EMEA.